|
PHIMG Event - Monday May 19th - Taiwan and Single Payer |
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, 30 April 2008 22:45 |
TAIWAN & SINGLE-PAYER What can Americans learn from Taiwan’s successful move to a national single-payer health insurance system?
In 1995, Taiwan implemented a national single-payer healthcare system that provides coverage tothe entire population for about 5% of GDP. America, despite spending nearly 3X as much as Taiwan on healthcare, has hundreds of millions of under and uninsured. Could Taiwan’s single payer success be replicated in the U.S.A?
To inform our judgment, we will screen “Sick Around The World” a PBS Frontline documentary that contrasts America’s market-based healthcare systems against the universal healthcare systems in use around the world, including Taiwan’s single-payer system.
After the screening we’ll be joined by Michael S. Chen, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Taiwan’s Bureau of National Health Insurance who will delivering a lecture on Taiwan’s successful move to single payer health insurance — the benefits and current challenges. Q&A will follow.
Monday, May 19th, 2008, 7:00 pm Venue: Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in New York. 1 East 42nd Street, 4th Floor. b/w 5th & Madison. RSVP:
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
|
|
|
Medicare chicken-littlism |
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, 30 April 2008 14:54 |
Reuters helps catapult the anti-Medicare propaganda in an article titled: 'Medicare "drifting towards disaster": U.S. official'
Medicare is lurching toward disaster and it is too late for the Bush Administration and Congress to do anything about it, U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Michael Leavitt said on Tuesday.
He said the next administration will have to act to stop rising costs and get control of the $400 billion federal health insurance plan for the elderly, which now covers 44 million people.
"Higher and higher costs are being borne by fewer and fewer people. Sooner or later, this formula implodes," Leavitt said in a speech to the right-leaning Heritage Foundation and American Enterprise Institute think-tanks.
...
Leavitt's speech echoes repeated warnings from other federal government officials who have noted that Medicare spending is projected to be 3.3 percent of gross domestic product in 2009 My Thoughts:
1. Bias: This "U.S. official" is political appointment by anti-government President Bush.
2. Double bias: His comments were delivered to two right wing "think-tanks" both of which were founded to undo progressive public programs like Medicare.
3. If the 40 million people covered by Medicare were covered by private insurance it would cost at least $30-$99 billion more given that private insurers spend 12-30% on administration whereas the efficient Medicare system spends only 4% on administr ation. 4. The solution to the problem is contained in his comments -- "by less and less people". We need to consider countering the right-wing noise on Medicare with a coordinated message: "Expand Medicare to save Medicare" by explaining the benefits of a universal risk pool versus what we do with Medicare right now -- redline out the most expensive patients to insure and make them the governments problem. |
|
Poll: Americans are getting married for health insurance |
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, 30 April 2008 14:10 |
The LA Times reports:
In a poll released today, 7% of Americans said they or someone in their household decided to marry in the last year so they could get healthcare benefits via their spouse.
"It's a small number but a powerful result, because it shows how paying for healthcare is reflected not only in family budgets but in life decisions," said Drew E. Altman, president of the Kaiser Family Foundation, which commissioned the survey as part of its regular polling on healthcare.
On a broader scale, the survey found that healthcare costs outranked housing costs, rising food prices and credit card bills as a source of concern. Twenty-eight percent of those surveyed said they had experienced serious problems because of the cost of healthcare, compared with 29% who had problems getting a good job or a raise. Gasoline prices were the top economic worry, with 44% saying they had serious problems keeping up with increases at the pump. ... Healthcare inflation has been rising at about twice the rate of economic growth, and it's unclear how much of a difference better prevention, computerized medical records and other ideas for containing costs might prove to be. But with employer-based health insurance averaging $12,000 for family coverage and $4,500 for individuals, the public concern with costs is understandable. Nearly a fourth of Americans said they had decided to keep or change jobs in the last year because of health insurance. ... Those who cited health insurance as a factor in deciding to marry tended to have modest incomes. About 6 in 10 were in households making less than $50,000 a year, said Mollyann Brodie, who directs Kaiser's opinion research. They also were younger, with 4 in 10 between 18 and 34.
|
|
Great Presentation from PNHP |
|
|
|
|
Tuesday, 29 April 2008 21:12 |
|
|
|
Junk fax sells you junk health care insurance |
|
|
|
|
Tuesday, 29 April 2008 20:15 |
Have you received a junk faxes selling you healthcare? I get them a lot but the latest one caught my eye. It throws a lot of statistics about the high cost of healthcare in the USA, like that we spend $6,700 per person and this is about 16% of our GDP). But not to worry! This company has the solution to high medical costs.
"Our low-cost nationwide healthcare package is the solution. We have contracted reduce rates with one of the largest PPO networks of Doctors and Hospitals in the US in order to provide wholesale prices to the public" What a fool I've been, all my life paying retail for health care!
"Be informed! Healthcare for you and you family can be affordable! $369 for a family - regularly $399" I called and learned some details. This is a PPO plan on the "Beech Street Network"...which I've never heard of. It's hard enough finding a provider willing to take my CIGNA plan, can't imagine how hard it is to find a "Beech Street" provider. This plan has $25 PCP co-pays. But whereas I pay nothing for "in-network" services with my Cigna plan, a subscriber of this plan foots the bill for 30% of all diagnostic services (blood tests, x-rays, MRI's etc.), therapies (he mentions a massage, but think Dialysis, etc.), and prescriptions ("You only pay $1.20 if you get a generic from Walmart!") There is also a $40,000 cap on ICU or ER, and you only get 60 days in the hospital, after that you have to pay 40%. After I ask a couple more questions to suss out these details, he flat out says that if I'm planning on having a heart attack or coming down with cancer that this wouldn't be a good plan for me. It's really only for healthy people. I asked "isn't the point of insurance to eliminate risk of financial ruin in case of disaster?" he says... "well there are different plans for different people." Exactly... Cadiliac plans for the wealthy who can afford $1,000 monthly premiums and Pinto plans for those who get swindled by low teaser rates. I'd love to see a show where some American Dad type sets about to insure his family in today's broken system, and is forced to become an expert on insurance and copays and lifteime limits, and in-network, out of network, and all this other garbage just to understand what he's really buying. Compare this to Taiwanese or Japanese Dad, who never has to deal with the stress, and never gets junk faxes selling him him junk health care insurance. |
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 1 of 11 |